Answer:
Intergenerational mobility.
Explanation:
Intergenerational mobility refers to the changes in social status between different generations within the same family, this type of mobility permits new generations to have better opportunities than the ones that their ancestors had and change their social status.
In this example Carlos' grandfather was an agricultural worker, Carlos' father worked as a clerk and because of their efforts, Carlos' is now able to graduate from college and medical school. We can see how Carlos' family has gone through changes in social status thanks to the efforts and opportunities they created.
Thus, this is an example of intergenerational mobility.
As far as I could find, the following were a feature of the reformin 1996:
increased work requirements (especially after two years)
a five-year limit on benefits from federal funds
So these were definitely a feature.
Of the remaining two, it is true that the cash assistance was diminished in 1996.
So i think that the transportation vouchers were not provided. Additionally, I found that transportation costs can be deducted from taxes by the employers, and that there is a number of smaller programs providing transportation benefits, but I don't think that they were a major part of the reform (so the last option).
Answer:b) naturalistic observation
Explanation:
Naturalistic observation is a technique under which observation of the subject is done in its natural environment.
Usually this technique is used when lab research will be unreasonable.
How Does Naturalistic Observation Work?
This technique may be used just because people's responses may be more effective when they are in their comfortable environment than when they are in a lab for research purposes.
Sometimes the result of the research are more effective when the behaviour is observed in an exactly moment when it happens. By watching how people respond to certain situations and stimuli in real-life, psychologists can get a better idea of how and why people react.
The correct answer is; criterion validity.
Further Explanation:
Karen developed the test so that she can measure the hostility in her workplace. She used previous employees who had been terminated on the basis of anger management issues. This has a high degree of criterion validity.
Her test is based on the prediction of an outcome and not on just factual information. This does work in some cases but only when the behavior closely matches the behavior of a previous case used in developing the test. If the cases are not very similar the test may not be conclusive.
Learn more about workplace hostility at brainly.com/question/6659394
#LearnwithBrainly
