Answer:
No, she did not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to answer if Mae stayed within her budget, given her budget and the total amount she later spent.
To solve this problem, what we need to do is to add up all what she budgeted. Afterwards we add up all she spent. Then , we see the difference between the two to actually know if she stayed within her budget of not.
We proceed as follows:;
Let’s calculate budgeted amount: This is ; 180 + 475 + 15 + 50 + 65 + 25 + 150 + 30 = $990
Now, let’s calculate how much she later spent; That would be; 182 + 475 + 12 + 65 + 68 + 12.5 + 36 + 150 = $1000.5
We can see that she spent more that the amount she had budgeted. This means she didn’t stay within the total amount allocated for her budget
Injurious consumption is negative in nature and not good at all for a person.
Utilizing resources to meet immediate needs and desires is known as consumption. It is contrasted with investing, which entails making purchases in order to acquire future revenue. Consumption is a key idea in economics and is also explored in a wide range of social sciences. Consumption is defined differently by various economic schools. Mainstream economists believe that only the final purchase of newly produced goods and services by individuals for immediate use qualifies as consumption; all other types of expenditure, including government spending, fixed investment, and intermediate consumption, are classified as separate categories (see Consumer choice). Many other economists define consumption as the whole of all economic activity that does not involve the creation, manufacturing, or selling of products and services.
learn more about consumption:
brainly.com/question/14933604
#SPJ4
Answer:
Balance sheet is the correct answer because it tells about the worth of company, its assets, shareholders funds (Equity) and amount borrowed by the company (Liability). Balance sheet is also known as Statement of Financial Position (SOFP)
All the other options tells about the earnings and costs of the company not about the assets and liabilities of the company.
Answer:
1) country A has a comparative advantage in production of capital goods.
2) for country A 24 units of food can be traded for 10 units of capital goods,
for country B 30 units of food can be traded for 10 units of capital goods.
Explanation:
country A has a comparative advantage in production of capital goods because they have been able to produce more capital goods with the same amount of input (worker) than country B.
For country A, 120 units of food = 50 units of capital goods, therefore
10 units of capital good will be traded for (120 x 10)/50 = 24 units of food.
for country B 90 units of food is equivalent to 30 units of capital goods, therefore,
(90 x 10)/30 = 30 units of food
Answer:
a. rule-utilitaria
Explanation:
According to my research on different business tactics and perspectives, I can say that based on the information provided within the question her approach is primarily influenced by rule-utilitarian. This term refers to a form of utilitarianism in which an action is right if it strives and focuses on the greater good. Which in this case is what Jenny is doing, since even though the decision to cut wages is bad, it is still viewed as good because it is a greater good.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
