Your client's investment portfolio is 50% growth stocks, 10% foreign stocks and 40% blue chip stocks. If the client is interested in further diversification which mutual fund would best meet that goal? Aggressive growth fund. Emerging market fund.
Answer:
Alejandro´s opportunity cost is 2/3 of a chart.
Roger´s opportunity cost is 1/2 of a chart.
Explanation:
The cost of opportunity represent the benefits that you misses out on when choosing one alternative over another.
In this case , we can say that Alejandro and Roger can produce 2 product. And if they produce one , they loose the possibility of producing the other.
We can Illustrate this situation with a production possibility frontiers graph and if we increase the quantity produced of one good, will decrease the other, because the limited resources.
Alejandro produce 3 three pages of the paper in the same time it takes him to create two charts. We use cross multiplication to get how many charts Alejandro produce at the same time he produce a single page
1___x
3___2 so x= 1x2/3
So , in the time he produce a single page of the essay, he could produce 2/3 of a chart. This is the cost opportunity.
Roger can write two pages of the paper in the same time he can produce a single chart. So, in the time he produce a single page of the essay he could make half of a chart.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": shortage costs increase as total carrying costs increase.
Explanation:
A shortage takes place when the quantity demanded is higher than the supply at the current price. Typically, shortages occur because of an increase in demand, a decrease in supply or due to government policies. Shortage costs are those costs a firm is responsible for because the is no enough stock in its inventory. When shortage costs increase, the carrying costs do not necessarily increase.
Answer:
Fair Value method, and only a portion of Ima's 2004 dividends represent earnings after Pal's acquisition.
Explanation:
The part of the dividend that reduce the carrying value of the investment can be said to be a liquidating dividend. Liquidating dividend is said to have occurred when the payment made by the investee is higher than the income that was earned in the course of the period in which the shares of the investee was owned by the investor.
On the other hand, the cost method treats liquidating dividends as spend or reduction in the investment account and treats normal dividend as income. Hence it is impossible for the firm to use equity method.
This is because dividend are seen as a reduction in investment account under the equity method. This means that dividends received cannot be taken as income in this method, hence C and D are wrong.