Ethnicity could disrupt the peaceful life in a country in many ways. One of the major ways is through ethnic conflicts.
Ethnic conflicts often arise due to different ethnic groups competing for powers, resources, or territory.
Where there are ethnic conflicts between different or various ethnic groups, this may lead to violent conflicts, thereby causing the killing of humans through civil wars, vandalization, etc.
These saddening events may lead to disruption of the peaceful life of a country through things like:
- Internal displacement,
- Regional instability,
- Economic failures,
- Environmental disasters, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the main ways in which ethnicity disrupts the peaceful life in a country in many ways are through "Ethnic conflict."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21006394
The correct answer is reverse double standard.
Double standards is described as <span>the </span>software of different sets<span> of </span>principles<span> for </span>comparable situations<span>. </span>it's far maximum typically seen<span> as a decisive </span>psychological tool<span> used to </span>protect<span> one’s ego or </span>unconscious<span> from the shortcomings </span>of 1<span>’s </span>very own<span> set of values or contrasting principals. </span>it's miles<span> the employment of a hypocritical and biased </span>standpoint<span>, with which </span>to separate<span> the </span>reputedly terrible<span> in others from the </span>bad<span> in oneself </span>by using<span> having </span>two sets<span> of </span>guidelines<span> for the </span>same idea<span>.</span>
Answer:
B. Porcelain
Explanation:
Ivory was found in Africa, Silk is not pottery, and Gunpowder was used in guns and in Great Britain.
Answer:
Equity(fair).
Explanation:
Tax cut in usual term is demonstrated as the rebate or reduction in the tax rate paid by the citizens to the government. Tax cuts are often considered as controversial political issue as some of the politicians assert that these cuts tend to serve more as a gain for the higher-income as compared to the lower-income groups which economists would categorize as a step taken in regard to establish the 'equity' among the tax rates. Because it becomes quite impartial or unfair to charge a higher tax rate from the higher-income groups and lesser from the lower-income groups. Therefore, the step is in regard to 'equity'.
