The majority of chemist would not find the claim that this form of helium did not release the same number of neutrons as other helium credible because :
The chemists claim is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence ( B )
The claim made by the chemists is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence because nuclear fusion is the reaction between two light nuclei to form heavy atomic nucleus ( one or more ) . during the reaction between the nuclei the release or absorption of heat reflects the differences in the masses of the reactants and product. It is not dependent on the amount of neutrons released.
Hence we can conclude that the claim is not credible because the Chemist claim is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence.
Learn more : brainly.com/question/18545784
Answer:
<em>Water would be considered a </em><u><em>actual renewable resource</em></u><em>.</em>
C. Actual renewable resource
Answer:
i wish i could help i don't know
Explanation:
It forms<span> in lagoons where ocean waters high in calcium and sulfate content </span>can<span>slowly evaporate and be regularly replenished with new sources of water. The result is the accumulation of large beds of sedimentary </span>gypsum<span>. </span>Gypsum<span> is </span>commonly<span>associated with rock salt and sulfur deposits.</span>
