All categories

3 years ago

Explain why the scenario below fails to address the protection that patent laws offer inventors.

Business

1 answer:

HACTEHA [7]3 years ago

8 0

<h2>The punishment given to copy the brain is very negligible.</h2>

Explanation:

The rule should be in such a manner that,

It does not punish the person who has not involved in the act of crime
Punishment should be in a manner that, it gives an opportunity for the criminal to correct himself.

Scenario explained:

Based on this idea, for this scenario, I feel like using the product of someone which is patented is crime but the punishment given for copying the product of someone is negligible.
So anyone can try to copy, just pay fine if they are caught.
So this neither satisfies rule number 1 mentioned above, nor satisfies rule number 2.

You might be interested in

According to the IS–LM model, if Congress raises taxes but the Fed wants to hold income constant, then the Fed must ______ the m

abruzzese [7]

Answer:

Increase

Explanation:

Population net income consists of the difference between labor income and expenditure. If the government adopts a contractionary fiscal policy, that is, increases taxes, the net income of the population will decrease, since part of the income will be directed to the payment of taxes. For the Fed to compensate for this decline in income, an expansionary monetary policy will have to be adopted, ie the Fed must act to stimulate the population's income. The increase in money supply has the effect of warming the economy in the form of higher demand and higher wages. This is the form of compensation between two different policies, one contractionist and one expansionist.

6 0

3 years ago

Two projects, A and B, are analyzed using ranking present worth analysis with MARR at i%. It is found that PW(A) . PW(B). If MAR

vivado [14]

Answer: The relationship between A and B project cannot be determined with the information given.

Explanation: The relationship between PW(A) and PW(B) is the correlation between project A and Project B in a portfolio.

This is not possible to be calculated with the information given.

But an expression of calculating this is;

PW is the present value of A and B projects.

MARR is the minimum acceptable rate of return

The calculate the correlation of the two project, divide MARR by the multiple of the two project.

That is;

Correlation = MARR ÷ [PW(A) × PW(B)]

Therefore;

Correlation = i11% ÷ [PW(A) × PW(B)]

This shows that the relationship cannot be determined with the limited Information supplied.

3 0

3 years ago

A purchaser paid $403.10 for a TV that cost the seller $290. If the seller's markup was 39% of the $290 cost, then what would be

CaHeK987 [17]

Percent markup based on the selling price: 28.1%

Explanation:

The cost of the TV for the seller was

$c=\$290$

Of this, the markup of this price was 39%. Therefore, the value of the markup (in dollars) with respect to the cost for the seller was

$m=0.39\cdot 290 =\$113.1$

So, this was the markup relative to the cost for the seller.

The price paid by the purchaser instead is

$p=\$403.1$

Therefore, the percent markup based on the selling price (paid by the purchaser) is:

$\frac{m}{p}\cdot 100 = \frac{113.1}{403.1}\cdot 100 =0.281\cdot 100 = 28.1\%$

Learn more about percentages:

brainly.com/question/82877

brainly.com/question/1834017

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0

3 years ago

The total number of items that the company carries within its product lines refers to the ___________ of the product mix.

wolverine [178]

D. consistency.
yeah! correct

7 0

3 years ago

Brief Exercise 12-05 Nabb & Fry Co. reports net income of $31,000. Interest allowances are Nabb $7,000 and Fry $5,000, salar

il63 [147K]

Answer:

The calculation is shown below:

Explanation:

The distribution of income is shown below:

Particulars Nate Frank Total

Interest Allowance $7,000 $5,000 $12,000

Salary Allowance $15,000 $10,000 $25,000

Total $22,000 $15,000 $37,000

Remainder (Equally) ($3,000) ($3,000) ($6,000)

Net Income $19,000 $12,000 $31,000

The remainder amount is come from

= $37,000 - $31,000

= $6,000

We simply added the interest allowance and the salary allowance and then deducted the remaining income so that the net income could come

8 0

3 years ago