Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
holds the power to set taxes
The answer above is true and correct✅
Answer:
a) Jake follows through on his work plan but is hindered but an unforeseen event.
Explanation:
Option a). shows a limitation in planning because here in this sentence, Jake is not certain about an unexpected event to occur while planning. Thus Jake although follows through his work plan but is affected and is obstructed to complete or finish his work according to what he have planned because of an uncertain event.
This shows his limitation in planning or lack of planning.
Thus the answer is
a) Jake follows through on his work plan but is hindered but an unforeseen event.
