When applying indirect proofs, we assume the negation of the conclusion is true, and show that this assumption would lead to nonsense, or contradiction.
In our case we assume a is not smaller than 7, that is we assume a≥7.
a≥7 then, multiplying both sides by 3:
3a≥21, then, adding both sides 7:
3a+7≥28,
which is a contradiction because 3a+7 is smaller than 28.
So our assumption is wrong, which means the opposite of it is correct.
Answer: assume a≥7
<span>The solution to the equation 2/3 A= -24 is the coordinate of point A.
2/3 A = -24
A = -24 / 2/3
A = -24 * 3/2
A = -72/2
A = -36
The solution to the equation 20=-b/0.5 is the coordinate of point B
20 = -b/0.5
20 * 0.5 = -b
10 = -b
10/-1 = -b/-1
-10 = b
A = -36 and B = -10
The distance between the two letters is 26 units. </span>
Hi there!
Let's assume that one month is represented by the variable 'm', the amount of minutes you started with is 's', and minutes you spent is 'p'.
So, one month can be represented as 'm=s-p'.
The next month is a bit more tricky. This will incorporate 75 less minutes into the equation. 'm=s-75' can be used to represent this, as we assume that you didn't use any minutes in the first month, and that p=75 in this case.
If you found this especially helpful, I'd appreciate if you'd vote me Brainliest for your answer. I want to be able to assist more users one-on-one, as well as to move up in rank! :)
Answer:
The explanation is given below
Step-by-step explanation:
Her error is that she multiplied the possibilities of her meal that involves eggs with milk, granola & oatmeal but the possibilities involves orange juice with egg and granola & oatmeal
Now
If she choose milk so she can select eggs, granola, and oatmeal so there are 3 possibilities also with the orange juice there is 3 possibilities
So, the sample space is
= 3 + 3
= 6 outcomes
Answer:
a) The original conditional statement
