Answer:
so the first one is a fragment as it doesn't start meaningful if you get what I mean and the second on is a sentence.....AYO I hope I'm right don't write the answer yet wait for someone else to answer it too because I'm not confident in my answers
Answer:
Explanation:
what does brain injury have to do with English
Answer: D. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.
Explanation:
Andrew Jackson’s address to the Congress and Michael Rutledge’s “Samuel’s Memory” certainly differ in writing techniques and language use. In Jackson's speech, there are long sentences, which makes the speech convincing and helps him demonstrate his intelligence. However, Rutledge's sentences are often short, quite simple and straightforward.
Answer:
Ok here are my answers...
Explanation:
I would say whatever challenge they have physically or mentally, or what they have to overcome during the story.
It can be internal mostly, because it is something mentally to overcome. External would be Man vs. Man, Man vs. Nature, or maybe Man vs. Society.
The conflict would be when things start to go awry or be more interesting. The sensory details could commit some more drama to the conflict depending on what the conflict is.
I hope this helps. I did not see the narratives that you were talking about, but I did my best. :)
<span>ARISTOPHANES was the greatest writer of old comedy in Athens in the fifth centuary and the only playwright from that era with any complete plays surviving .Knowledge of Aristophanes is confined mostly to his carrer as a dramatist.He poked fun at euripides in one of his satires.</span>
