Appeals are decided by panels of three judges working together. The appellant presents legal arguments to the panel, in writing, in a document called a "brief." In the brief, the appellant tries to persuade the judges that the trial court made an error, and that its decision should be reversed.
Answer: True
Explanation:
The federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution. While the state and the people have the remaining power.
This was necessary, so the state and the people could have freedom of right and address some decisions which doesn't seat well with them when proposed by the Federal government.
Answer with Explanation:
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.
Answer:
Spain gained great power and prestige; they dominated the Americas and possessed a vast amount of land and wealth. The country reined for a very long time after Columbus' discoveries, bringing jealousy to other countries. To the Europeans, the widespread of their Christianity beliefs was named very well for them
Explanation:
Non Metal
brittle, poor conductor for heat poor conductor of electricity, dull surface
Metal
malleable, Good Conductor for electricity, Good Conductor of heat, shiny surface
Hope This Helps :D
