If the numbers after the decimal terminate, yes, it's rational.
9.521521521 = 9,521,521,521 / 1,000,000,000
If they don't terminate, but the pattern continues (which I suspect is the case here), yes, it's still rational.
If <em>x</em> = 9.521521521…, then
1000<em>x</em> = 9521.521521521…
Subtract <em>x</em> from this to eliminate the fractional part:
1000<em>x</em> - <em>x</em> = 9521.521521521… - 9.521521521…
999<em>x</em> = 9512
<em>x</em> = 9512/999
If they don't terminate, but the pattern does <em>not</em> continue, meaning the next few digits could be something random like
9.521521521<u>19484929271283583457</u>…
then the number would be irrational.
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
This is false because a population represents all and not some. A population is the collection of all outcomes, responses, measurements, or counts that are of interest. It is not a collection of 'some' outcomes. It is a collection of 'all' outcomes.
A population data set is a set which contains all the items or elements of a specified group or data set. It is a complete list of all the possible data values.
The sample of a population are drawn out of a population. They are A subset of a population.
Answer:
4/-5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
80 yards
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 3 feet in a yard, therefore you take 240 feet divided by 3 to get how many yards there are, and in your case it is 80 yards.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Required
Integrate
We have:
Let
Differentiate
Make dx the subject
So, we have:
Express x^(10) as x^(5*2)
Rewrite as:
Recall that:
Integrate
Substitute:
Hence:
