Answer:
a. n=4148
b. n=3909
c. The sample size is smaller if a known proportion from prior study is used. The difference in sample sizes is 239
Step-by-step explanation:
a. For sample where no preliminary estimate is given, the minimum sample size is calculated using the formula:

Where:
Margin of error
is the assumed proportion
#Let p=0.5, substitute in the formula to solve for n:

Hence, the minimum sample size is 4148
b. If given a preliminary estimate p=0.38, we use the same formula but substitute p with the given value:

Hence, the minimum sample size is 3909
c. Comparing the sample sizes from a and b:

Hence, the actual sample size is smaller for a known proportion from prior a prior study.
Answer:
linear
non-linear
Step-by-step explanation:
You multiply 4 and 47 so 188 would be the answer. Hope this helps! :)
Based on the numbers we have we can assume that she saves 3 times more each week than the last (1*3=3, 3*3=9).
Following this trend we would multiply the amount she saved the third week ($9) by 3 to get $27 for the fourth week.
Then, we would multiply the amount she saved the fourth week ($27) by 3 to get $81 for the fifth week.
Finally, to figure out how much she saved in the 5 weeks, we need to add each value up to get 1+3+9+27+81= $121 saved in 5 weeks
R is 18 and x is 12 is the answer of your
question