A I believe is the answer. Hope it helps and I am sorry if it is wrong.
Answer:
No, it is not a valid argument for import protection
Explanation:
There are several arguments that are waged in favor of protectionism. One of the most common, that is seen in this question, in the unfair competition argument, in which domestic producers argue that producers from abroad pay unfair wages, or engage in dumping, or do not pay enough for raw materials.
The fact is, what is a substandard wage in the United States, is probably an average, or even higher-than-average wage in Indonesia, because wages are determined by the market conditions in each country. Indonesia, as a low-income country, has wages on average well below the average wage in the United States, a high-income country.
Therefore, domestic producers do not have any valid reason to demand import protection because Indonesian producers pay substantially lower wages than them. These are economic realities given by market conditions.
Answer:
The correct answer is number "3": doesn't reduce quality or increase price.
Explanation:
Different groups of people within a market imply different needs and preferences pushing companies to diversify in order to fulfill them. Though, one of the main characteristics of that diversification must be accessibility. Companies expect to gain in sales thanks to the segmentation of the market but not necessarily by increasing the price of the new products being sold or decreasing their quality.
