I believe this is a personal question
Answer:
survival intelligence and adaptation to the wild circumstances
Explanation:
The recourse for dealing with overzealous prosecutors includes Private admonition or reprimand. Hence, option A is appropriate.
<h3>What is the meaning of the Prosecutors?</h3>
In jurisdictions with either a civil law independent judiciary or a common law adversarial system, a prosecutor is a prosecuting attorney of the prosecution.
Federal prosecutors want to retry the case. A prosecutor is indeed a legal agent who formally accuses someone else of committing a felony by presenting an argument against that individual in a court of law.
A prosecutor is often a lawyer with a law degree who has been approved as a qualified attorney by the jurisdiction in which they're functioning. This could imply that they have been admitted toward the bar or, if applicable, earned a comparable qualification. Hence, option A is correct.
Learn more about Prosecutor here:
brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ1
Answer:
Here are several reasons for that:
- Every society's population contains a lot of genetic mixture,
- Various racial categories are genetically very much alike,
- The skin color of Caucasian people ranges from very light to very dark.
Explanation:
The fact that there are a large number of similarities between people form different races and varieties between people from same race indicates that there are very little difference between races. (approximately, people form different races only has around 6% of genetic difference)
From the social perspective, differentiating and the racial difference tend to lead to tribalism that make groups of a certain race believe that the others are inferior compared to them. This will increase the risk of conflicts.
Answer:
C. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
The case of Marbury v. Madison determined the power that the judicial branch of the government can have to limit the power of the legislative branch of the government.
Prior to the case, the congress can basically pass any laws that they want without any repercussion.
The case granted the Supreme court with the power of judicial review. This enable the supreme court to examine every laws proposed by Congress before its passed. The supreme court can rejected the proposal and prevented it from becoming actual law if it violated any part of the constitutions.
