Answer:
A decrease in demand leads to a decrease in supply.
A decrease in price leads to a decrease in supply.
An increase in price leads to an increase in supply.
Explanation:
Supply refers to the volume of a product that sellers are willing to sell in the market at a given price. As per the law of supply, a higher price motivates sellers to avail more products in the markets. Sellers or suppliers are businesses and are motivated by higher profits. When prices are high, the profit margin will be high, which is an incentive for increased supply. Lower prices have lower margins, which is a risk to a business. Low prices result in reduced prices.
Supply is influenced by demand. If supply does not match demand, there will be either a shortage or excess supply in the market. When demand is low, sellers will reduce supply to avoid losses associated with excess supply .
Might seem controversial though :) but I am pretty sure that the correct variant that properly shows the converse of given statement is the third one. As you know, the converse (in plane language) has the same meaning of the statement just by replacing two points. This statement has positive tone (if you make - you ll have) so it's directly coincides with C(you have, cause you have made)
Answer:
Specific performance
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the order that Wally should seek is known as Specific performance. This is a court order which forces the breaching party to perform the agreed upon act, and by doing so complete the agreed upon specifications set forth by the contract. Failure to do so will find the individual in contempt of court.
Answer:Expected value = - 94661.45
Explanation:
The Policy pay out is $95000 ,if a client is in life threatening accident insurance company will loose $95000, if the client is not in a life threatening accident the insurance company will gain $250
Probability (Client is in a threatening accident) = 0.999063
Probability (not in a life threatening accident)= 1 - 0.999063 = 0000937
Insurance Premium = $250
Insurance Payout = $95000
expected value = 0.999063 x (- (95000 - 250)) + 0.000937 x (250)
expected value = 0.999063 x (-94750) + 0.000937 x (250)
expected value = - 94661.21925 + 0.23425 = - 94661.44675
expected value = - 94661.45
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.
