Answer:
The problem with economic globalization is that the economic benefits are not shared equally. Officers and shareholders of international corporations are in a position to get richer, while the poor get poorer. The plight of the poor might be lessened by welfare, but the bigger problem is the resulting insane wealth of international capitalists, which gives them more political power by financing politicians and buying media outlets to influence voters.
Answer:
The resources in a region help people decide which crops to grow and which goods to produce. ... Specialization results when people make goods using the resources they have. Today all regions of the United States are interdependent. People trade with other regions for goods and services they do not have.
Answer: No, they can not.
Explanation: The Articles of Confederation was very weak. The Articles of Confederation could not impose taxes, which means it could not fund a proper army. So, it would need each of the states to deal with the problem by themselves with a militia.
The answer is letter C. The economy tying of all a small, poor country to a big, rich country is called dependency. The big and rich country helps or improves the small and poor country while the poor small country provides cheaper labor, available natural resources and markets for the developed countries.
Answer:
This is because, the people believed that, Stephen Douglas and John Bell were more favourable disposed to maintain the status quo regarding to the policy of the majority of the US States when compared to J. Breckinridge and Abraham Lincoln who wished to change the policy favorable to the people.
A typical example is between Stephen Douglas and Abraham Lincoln. While Douglas wanted the States to determine if to stop slave trade by popular opinion of the people living in such states, Abraham Lincoln wanted slavery to be stopped entirely in the country due to his believe that it is a national embarassment (and not minding whether they whole states in the country want it or not).
Majority of the slave tolerant states saw Abraham Lincoln as an extremist who wanted to disrupt the status quo regarding to slave ownership and trading hence the reason the went to war inorder to maintain that policy of slave ownership.
Explanation:
