Answer:
Classify
Explanation:
According to my research on observational studies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this allows scientists to classify them for study. Classify species allows all scientists to group together organisms and better understand how everything works. It also helps with evolutionary theories.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
no. because it's like saying that someone who is related to Ted Bundy should go to jail because they are related and because they are that they should go to jail to for the mutable murderings. when really they had nothing to do with it. my point is, is no because no everyone in a family is all good and imagines werent born here so why should they be a loud.
I believe it's most likely the <span>haiku and kabuki.
</span>
1. D. Axum
Axum is located in what is now Ethiopia, and was founded by Arabs combining Arabic and African cultures. Axum owed its prosperity to its location along the Red Sea, on the trade route between India and the Mediterranean. Axum exported ivory, incense, myrrh, and slaves. It imported textiles, metal goods, wine, and olive oil.
2. A: Arabic was the main language used when trading with other societies.
Although Arabic was the most common language used in trade, others were used as well, particularly Swahili. In everyday life West Africa had enormous linguistic variety.
Answer:
Stone were used
Bone
Explanation:
Throughout the Paleolithic, humans were food gatherers, depending for their subsistence on hunting wild animals and birds, fishing, and collecting wild fruits, nuts, and berries. The artifactual record of this exceedingly long interval is very incomplete; it can be studied from such imperishable objects of now-extinct cultures as were made of flint, stone, bone, and antler. These alone have withstood the ravages of time, and, together with the remains of contemporary animals hunted by our prehistoric forerunners, they are all that scholars have to guide them in attempting to reconstruct human activity throughout this vast interval—approximately 98 percent of the time span since the appearance of the first true hominin stock. In general, these materials develop gradually from single, all-purpose tools to an assemblage of varied and highly specialized types of artifacts, each designed to serve in connection with a specific function. Indeed, it is a process of increasingly more complex technologies, each founded on a specific tradition, that characterizes the cultural development of Paleolithic times. In other words, the trend was from simple to complex, from a stage of nonspecialization to stages of relatively high degrees of specialization, just as has been the case during historic times.
In the manufacture of stone implements, four fundamental traditions were developed by the Paleolithic ancestors: (1) pebble-tool traditions; (2) bifacial-tool, or hand-ax, traditions; (3) flake-tool traditions; and (4) blade-tool traditions. Only rarely are any of these found in “pure” form, and this fact has led to mistaken notions in many instances concerning the significance of various assemblages. Indeed, though a certain tradition might be superseded in a given region by a more advanced method of producing tools, the older technique persisted as long as it was needed for a given purpose. In general, however, there is an overall trend in the order as given above, starting with simple pebble tools that have a single edge sharpened for cutting or chopping. But no true pebble-tool horizons had yet, by the late 20th century, been recognized in Europe. In southern and eastern Asia, on the other hand, pebble tools of primitive type continued in use throughout Paleolithic times.
