1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Studentka2010 [4]
3 years ago
8

Is the square root of 5 times the square root of 5 rational?

Mathematics
1 answer:
a_sh-v [17]3 years ago
5 0
 No 20.0000004 cannot be rational.
You might be interested in
1+√3+1-√3<br>1 * 604 * 909 ​
brilliants [131]

1 + √3 + 1 - √3

= 1 + 1

= <u>0</u>

1 * 604 * 909

= <u>549,036</u>

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Both families use 1250 kWh for the given 30 day period. The Freeman family uses 400 kWh during on-peak hours and 850 during off-
Natalka [10]
Ok ummm I honestly don’t know I’m so sorry I couldn’t help you wit this prob
8 0
3 years ago
The supplement of an angle is 3 times the measure. What is the measure of the angle?
cluponka [151]
I don’t know for sure but maybe 60?
3 0
3 years ago
430 randomly selected light bulbs were tested in a laboratory, 224 lasted more than 500 hours. Find a point estimate of the prop
Ray Of Light [21]
The estimated portion of light bulbs that last more than 500 hours will be
x=∑xn=224/430=0.521=52.1%
6 0
3 years ago
Please help! I cannot figure this out, I have no idea what to do.
joja [24]

3. First you should identify which line corresponds to which equation.

x + 2y = -8   ⇒   y = -x/2 - 4

is the line with slope -1/2 and intercept (0, -4), so the first inequality refers to the lower line in the graph.

For the inequality itself, the solution set that satisfies it is either the region above or below it. To decide which, pick any point in the plane and plug its coordinates into the inequality. The origin is a natural choice, since it's not on the line and working with 0s is easy.

In the first inequality, we have

x = 0 and y = 0   ⇒   0 + 2•0 = 0 < -8

which is not true. So (0, 0) is not in the solution set, and it stands to reason that any point in the same region will not be a solution. In other words, the region above the line x + 2y = -8 does not satisfy the inequality, while the one below it does.

In the second inequality,

x = 0 and y = 0   ⇒   2•0 + 0 = 0 ≥ -1

which is true. This means the region containing (0, 0) above the upper line solves the second inequality.

The solution to the system of inequalities is then the intersection of these two regions. (See attached; I've labeled the solution to the first inequality in blue, the solution to the second one in red, and the solution to both in green.)

All this work is kind of overkill for this particular question, though. All you really need to do is check if the given point satisfies the inequalities:

• (-5, 5) :

x = -5 and y = 5   ⇒   -5 + 2•5 = 5 < -8   ⇒   NO

• (2, -5) :

x = 2 and y = -5   ⇒   -2 + 2•5 = 8 < -8   ⇒   NO

• (-4, -6) :

x = -4 and y = -6   ⇒   -4 + 2•(-6) = -16 < -8   ⇒   MAYBE

x = -4 and y = -6   ⇒   2•(-4) + (-6) = -14 < -8   ⇒   YES

• (5, -7) :

x = 5 and y = -7   ⇒   5 + 2•(-7) = -9 < -8   ⇒   MAYBE

x = 5 and y = -7   ⇒   2•5 + (-7) = 3 < -8   ⇒   NO

4. x is the number of candy boxes with chocolates and y is the number of boxes without chocolates. Each of the x boxes cost $27.50, so if you have x boxes, their total cost is $27.5x. Each of the y boxes cost $25.00, so y boxes cost $25y. The sponsor doesn't want to order more than 100 boxes total, so

x + y < 100

but wants to raise at least $2000, so

27.5x + 25y ≤ 2000

Now do the same thing as before; plug in the listed x- and y-coordinates and pick the point that satisfies both inequalities. You will find that (50, 30) is the correct choice.

5. Consult the "overkill" part of problem 3. The line y = -3x + 6 has a negative slope, so it's the downward sloping one. Check if the origin satisfies the inequality:

x = 0 and y = 0   ⇒   0 ≤ -3•0 + 6   ⇒   0 ≤ 6   ⇒   YES

This means Regions II and III solve the first inequality.

Do the same with the other inequality:

x = 0 and y = 0   ⇒   0 ≥ 1/2•0 + 1   ⇒   0 ≥ 1   ⇒   NO

This tells us that Regions I and II solve the second inequality.

The intersection of these regions is of course Region II.

6. One of the plotted lines is apparently y = x + 4, which has a positive slope, so this must be the upper line. The shaded region below it corresponds to the solution of either y < x + 4 or y ≤ x + 4 and we eliminate B.

The other line has negative slope, which eliminates A and D since

3x - 4y = 20   ⇒   y = 3/4x - 5

has positive slope. This leaves D.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • If measurement angle L = 58 then measurement angle LKJ = _________ degrees.
    7·1 answer
  • list all the integer x that satisfy both the simultaneous linear inequalities 5-x&lt;3 and x÷2 +3&lt;5
    7·1 answer
  • A family of five goes out to dinner and spends $114.10. This includes a 20% tip. How much did the family's server receive for a
    6·2 answers
  • Solve.<br> f/5 - 24 = -28 <br><br> f =
    8·2 answers
  • a long sleeved shirt costs $21. That is 3 times more than a short sleeved shirt how much does a short sleeved shirt cost
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the system of equations <br> How many solutions does this system have.
    11·1 answer
  • Please help ! I’ll give you a lot of points !
    8·2 answers
  • Find the differential of the function w=xsin(2yz^4).
    5·1 answer
  • Tell whether the given value is a solution of the inequality. (yes or no)<br><br> -2 ≤ k/3; k = -9
    11·1 answer
  • Find the surface area of this rectangular prism. Be sure to include the correct unit in your answer.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!