Answer:
The proof is derived from the summarily following equations;
∠FBE + ∠EBD = ∠CBA + ∠CBD
∠FBE + ∠EBD = ∠FBD
∠CBA + ∠CBD = ∠ABD
Therefore;
∠ABD ≅ ∠FBD
Step-by-step explanation:
The two column proof is given as follows;
Statement 
Reason
bisects ∠CBE Given
Therefore;
∠EBD ≅ ∠CBD Definition of angle bisector
∠FBE ≅ ∠CBA Vertically opposite angles are congruent
Therefore, we have;
∠FBE + ∠EBD = ∠CBA + ∠CBD Transitive property
∠FBE + ∠EBD = ∠FBD Angle addition postulate
∠CBA + ∠CBD = ∠ABD Angle addition postulate
Therefore;
∠ABD ≅ ∠FBD Transitive property.
We need to see the graph in order to solve this problem
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
- A. (x, y) = (1, -1)
- B. (1, -1), (2, 0)
- C. (0, 3). This is where their graphs cross, meaning g(x) = f(x) at that point.
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
A solution to a pair of equations is the set of points where their graphs intersect. Points in that set will satisfy both equations, which is what "solution" means.
Here, the graphs of p(x) and f(x) each intersect the graph of g(x) in one place. Hence f(x) = g(x) has one solution, as does p(x) = g(x).
Finding the solution is a matter of reading the coordinates of the point of intersection from the graph.
A. The graphs interesect at x=1, y=-1.
B. Any point on the red line is a solution. We already know one of them from part A. Another is the x-intercept, where y=0. That point is (2, 0).
C. g(x) intersects f(x) at their mutual y-intercept: y = 3. x = 0 at that point.
Answer: Ron
Step-by-step explanation: 1/5 is a larger number than 1/100. 1/5 means that Ron talked for 20 minutes an hour, but Jacob talked on the phone for 1 minute an hour.
Your answer is c. 0.5454545... because an irrational number is one that repeats itself.
