1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aev [14]
3 years ago
12

The landmark US Supreme Court case Metro-Goldwin-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005) exempts information c

ontent providers from liability for copyright infringement as long as they never actually infringe on copyrights on First Amendment grounds. Please choose answer (a) if this statement is true or (b) if this statement is false
Law
2 answers:
Mkey [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a

Explanation:

amendment cannot in any way affect the cases decided by supreme court

Basile [38]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:Answer:

The answer to the question is  (b) false.

Explanation:

This is as the case between MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005) was determined by the US Supreme Court that Groksker and Streamcast were liable to fine and could be sued for their peer to peer (P2P) file sharing marketing and for inducing copyrights infringements during marketing of the same file sharing software.

The Court unanimously concurred that Grokster could be liable for inducing copyright infringement.

You might be interested in
HELP PLEASE!!!
Reil [10]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

in your own opinion

good luck

4 0
2 years ago
Points bc why not? :)
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

ARE THESE FREE POINTS!?!?!?!

Explanation:

<h2>PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h2>
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the president's major roles does the passage demonstrate
Lynna [10]

I think his major roles are to speak & notify the outside world on what's going on around the world & the United States.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the colonists criticize the stamp act as taxation
Gnom [1K]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Stamp Act was enacted to cause the colonists to pay the tax. This was represented by the stamp on various kinds of documents and papers. The colonists actually criticized the Stamp Act by calling it as taxation without representation because the government cannot generate tax without showing representation of goods and services in the Parliament. This lead to the adverse colonial reaction to this Act caused the boycott of British goods. This was also associated with the riots and attack of colonists over the tax collectors.

7 0
3 years ago
Why might some argue that prohibiting a former offender from having a driver's license can lead to secondary deviance?
Masja [62]

Answer:

А. They may have to rely on former friends for transportation, putting them back in touch with the criminal world.

Explanation:

Being a criminal isn't an individual thing, rather it is really a group situation. For many offenders, their only friends are other criminals or those more likely to commit criminal acts. Thus, having only their friends to rely on for rides (Which is what most people will do) creates a risk of secondary deviance.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was The first state to pass insurance legislation
    10·1 answer
  • Maintaining the security of crime scene photographs is vitally important. Every time photographs change possession, the name of
    10·1 answer
  • Hey I'm trying to reachout for someone and that person knows who it is and if you see this message please, comment below and my
    14·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the Vehicle Exception?
    14·1 answer
  • A man walks into a bar orders a drink and asks the bartender why he chose that profession. The bartender tells him that you don'
    15·1 answer
  • What are the 3 appendices?
    10·1 answer
  • A police officer is struggling to arrest a man who has just assaulted a shopkeeper you see the police officer kneeling on the de
    10·2 answers
  • What is required for the establishment of stare decisis as a legal principle?
    12·1 answer
  • Congratulations! You were just informed that you are the new Police Chief in a rather large city where an officer-involved shoot
    11·1 answer
  • an injury that occurs while an employee is commuting to or from work is usually not considered to have occurred on the job or in
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!