What's the whole number of 2/2
2 answers:
You might be interested in
The sequences that would map the triangles so as to support both claims are explained below:
<em>Transformation</em> is a process in which the dimensions, size or orientation of a given shape is <em>adjusted</em>. The types are: translation, reflection, rotation and dilation.
Thus;
A. The sequence of transformations that will <u>support</u> Tim's thinking are:
i. <em>Reflection</em> of triangle A <em>about</em> the y-axis.
ii. <em>Reflection</em> of the triangle the <em>second</em> time now about x-axis.
iii. <em>Translation</em> of the triangle two units to the right (i.e towards the x-axis)
These steps would map triangle A unto triangle B supporting Tim's claim.
B. The sequence of transformations that will <u>support</u> Jennifer's claim are:
i. First <em>rotate</em> triangle A by using the origin of the axis as the reference point.
ii. Then <em>translate</em> triangle A two units to the right (i.e towards the x-axis).
Therefore, these steps will map triangle A unto B to support Jennifer's claim.