Answer:this is what I remember
Explanation: the upper class is wealthy middle is people who have average jobs and money and working class is people who are forced to work
sorry if I got it wrong that’s what I remember
Since the beginning of time people were meant to belong to tribes. Helping people in need is a basic gesture that keeps us humble and essentially, human. Many peoples struggles are beyond their means and without assistance, poverty would become unmanageable.
“Disadvantages. In the first years of a new nonprofit, it may seem counterproductive to implement term limits for board members. Serving on the board of a start-up nonprofit that lacks resources is rarely prestigious and is typically labor intensive since most start-ups lack staff. It can be difficult to find qualified directors who possess the requisite passion for the cause, understanding of the mission, and willingness to work. Another disadvantage of term limits is that the organization will spend more time and resources to recruit and educate new directors and will lose the group cohesion that comes with directors who have worked together for a long time. Additionally, the organization may lose directors who are fervent supporters of the organization and the mission.
Advantages. While the above points may lead incorporators to create a board without term limits, it is important to remember that there are also many positive aspects of term limits that may outweigh the negative aspects. For example, an organization with term limits may be better able to attract active and involved members of the community who are not able to make a long term commitment to the organization. Term limits allow busy executives and community leaders to serve the organization and bring fresh new ideas that they may not otherwise have been able to share had they been required to make a longer-term commitment.”
Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
