1, 4, and 7 will be the digits that make 3,71_ divisible by 3.
So, let's say the number is x.
5(x + 27) ≥ 6( x + 26)
Height of Sandra that is already mentioned in the question is = 4 feet
Percentage by which Pablo is taller than Sandra = 10%
Height by which Pablo is greater than Sandra = (10/100) * 4
= (4/10)
= 0.4 feet
Then height of Pablo is = 4 + 0.4
= 4.4 feet
Now we can find the height of Michaela as she is 8% taller than Pablo.
Percent by which Michaela is taller than Pablo = 8%
Height by which Michaela is greater than Pablo = (8/100) * 4.4
= (2 * 4.4)/25
= 0.35 feet
Then the height of Michaela = (4.4 + 0.35) feet
= 4.75 feet
So height of Michaela is 4.75 feet. This is the way this problem has to be solved.
Step-by-step explanation:
to compare day 1 with day 2 :
100% = 8
1% = 100%/100
25% = 25×1% = 100% × 25/100 = 8 × 1/4 = 2
so, on day 2 he walks 8+2 = 10 laps.
on day 3 he walks then 10-1 = 9 laps.
so, now, to calculate the % decrease compared to day 2
100% = 10
1% = 100%/100 = 0.1
how many % is represented by this 1 lap he was walking less ?
1 / 1% = 1 / 0.1 = 10%
so he had a 10% decrease from day 2 to day 3.
Answer:conjectured that F(n)≈0.72∗n∗f(n). Following that clue, we can find the following identity holds for all cases we tested by trial and error.
F(n)=nf(n)−(n−2)f(n−2)+(n−4)f(n−4)−(n−6)f(n−6)+⋯
where the sequence of summands goes on as long as the summand makes sense.
Step-by-step explanation:
