Evidence-based practise (EBP) is the process of making decisions regarding the care of the people you serve using the most recent, highest-quality research (including external and internal scientific evidence).
The actions to encourage the use of EBPs might be seen from the viewpoint of persons who do research or produce knowledge.
The three strategies of Evidence-based practise (EBP) are:
- the generation and distillation of information;
- its spread and dissemination; and
- its acceptance and use within organisations.
The first step in these stages of knowledge transfer, which are seen through the eyes of researchers and knowledge makers, is deciding which discoveries from the patient safety portfolio or specific research projects should be shared.
To learn more about Evidence-based practise (EBP), refer
brainly.com/question/11056307
#SPJ4
Answer: Assembly-line justice.
Explanation:
There is relatively little research testing for racial discrimination in the sentencing of individuals convicted of misdemeanor offenses. Because the lower courts where misdemeanor cases are handled usually have huge caseloads and informal, nonadversarial procedures for delivering what is often referred to as <u>assembly-line justice</u>, one might predict that the likelihood of racially disparate decisions would be even greater in these courts than in the more formal felony courts.
<u>Assembly-line justice</u> is a system of justice in which where we find an static process that does not distinguish any kind of contemplations on a regular case to case basis, as a consequence of this, all cases end up being sorted out the same way.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because opportunity cost is the loss of potential gain from other choices when one choice is chosen.
I can only answer the last four so yeah.
B
A
C
C or D
Answer:
<h3>hope it helps...........!!!</h3>