The prospect of greater market share and setting themselves apart from the competition is an incentive for firms to innovate and make better products. But no firm possesses a dominant market share in perfect competition. Profit margins are also fixed by demand and supply.
A perfectly competitive firm is a price taker, which means that it must accept the equilibrium price at which it sells goods. If a perfectly competitive firm attempts to charge even a tiny amount more than the market price, it will be unable to make any sales.
Perfect competition occurs when there are many sellers, there is easy entry and exiting of firms, products are identical from one seller to another, and sellers are price takers.
The market structure is the conditions in an industry, such as number of sellers, how easy or difficult it is for a new firm to enter, and the type of products that are sold.
Hope this helps:)
Preparing closing entries, which involves journalizing and uploading the entries to the ledger, is the eighth phase in the accounting cycle. During closure, there are four entries. To the Income Summary account, the initial entry cancels revenue accounts.
<h3>What order should the steps for closing an account be taken in?</h3>
Following is the basic order of closing entries: Clear the balances in the revenue accounts by debiting each revenue account and crediting the income summary account. To eliminate the balances in all expenditure accounts, credit all expense, accounts and debit the revenue summary account.
A journal entry debiting all revenue accounts and crediting the income summary is used to accomplish this. The same procedure is then used to calculate expenditures. Crediting the expense accounts and debiting the income summaries closes out all expenditures.
To know more about closing entries, refer:
brainly.com/question/13469087
#SPJ4
You reply that "OMOs are the purchase and sale of government securities. To increase the money supply we will buy government securities which increases the amount of reserves in the banking system and fuels deposit expansion".
<u>Option: A</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The action of central bank to offer or take liquidity from or into a bank or a collection of banks in its exchange rate currencies is understood as an open market operation or OMO. The central bank is the only origin of such policy which may either purchase or sell the bonds of government on the open market or in what is now often the acceptable option, engage into a repo or protected lending agreement with a commercial bank: the central bank lend the monetary as a reserve over a given period of time and concurrently selects the qualified asset as security.
Here the Chair of the Federal Reserve Board explained OMO for the purpose of their use in the scenario of increasing money supply, by purchasing or selling the bonds or securities of public authorities to eligible bodies for the increment of assets in banking sector to drive the expansion of deposits.
Answer:
$10,080
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of the job is shown below:
We know that
prime cost = direct material + Direct labor
= $2,000 + $5,200
= $,7200
Now overhead is
= 40% of $7200
= $2,880
And,
Cost of job = direct material + Direct labor + overhead
= $2,000 + $5,200 + $2,880
= $10,080
Answer:
b) A free market in tradable permits is typically more efficient that government regulation
Explanation:
- When companies are forced to buy rights to pollute, they are paying a cost for the pollution they create. If they pollute more, they will end paying more for that pollution. (demand of rights to pollute)
- On the other hand, companies that pollute almost nothing can sell rights to pullute saving money: this will create a benefit for companies who take care of environment. (supply of rights to pollute)
- Then, there will be a market of rights to pullute, where some companies will sell and others will buy rights to pullute. In this market, the price of rights to pollute will be determined efficiently.
- Because the production of absolutely every good or service sold in our economy implies pollution, there is a cost society is willing to pay in terms of pollution to get the goods and services it consumes.<em> For example</em>, I am willing to keep buying soda, besides I now for sure its production has certain negative effects on environment. I demand the product, therefore the company (that pollutes) has incentives to keep selling the product.
- The cost we are willing to pay to keep consuming goods will be related to the demand and supply of rights to pollute : companies whose producs are more demanded (by us!) would buy more rights to pollute when neccesary, and companies whose products are not that demanded will buy less rights to pollute, transmiting this results to prices.
- Then, pollution rights became an efficient way of assigning a price to pollution.
