The correct option is C
<u>Explanation:</u>
Non-association complaint techniques fluctuate generally in their structure from casual open entryway arrangements to expound peer survey and assertion based methodology. The selection of these systems is driven by a scope of elements including association substation, suit shirking, and as a component of human asset techniques concentrated on advancing high responsibility from representatives.
Non-association complaint methods will, in general, be utilized less much of the time that their association partners, yet use levels fluctuate depending on the structure of the methodology with those joining non-administrative leaders displaying higher utilization levels.
Therefore, Option c is correct - Do not frequently have an employee's grievance decided by a third-party neutral.
Hi there! I know you asked for eight methods but I can only think of five methods. The first method would be to be aware of your own country. The second method is to become and or think like a learner. The third method is get mystical as in get curios. It's like think. The fourth method is to listen. And the last but not least. The fifth method is look at different cultures.
Answer:
Letter B is correct. <u>Narrowing the gap between theory and practice.</u>
Explanation:
Case study is an investigative methodological approach applied to simple or applied social sciences. It is carried out through the use of different qualitative methods for the collection of data and information relevant to the foundation of the research. The qualitative method is the most appropriate in a case study, as it occurs through subjective and not substantially statistical means of in-depth analysis of relevant factors in an event, an individual, an institution, a group and others.
Case studies can be classified as:
- exploratory,
- descriptive, or
- explanatory.
So it is correct to state that the purpose of the case study is to reduce the difference between theory and practice. Because the analysis of the information collected and the variables and patterns found will provide subsidies for the discussion and better understanding and reasoning between what happens between the theory and the practice analyzed in the case study.
Somebody whose job is to provide analytics or research should always be someone who is very good at quantitative analysis. They should be good with math and numbers, because their job is to analyze a business. The same goes for research. A good researcher is good at math because they have to analyze large datasets. This person would also be pretty detail-oriented because they need to make sure that they are not making small mistakes, as small mistakes could result in poor decisions that come out of their analysis.
Does that make sense?
I had to look for the options and here is my answer. In the comparison of political, economic and environmental push and pull factors, we can say that the statement that shows accuracy related to this is this: "the most common environmental push factor is water." (This answer is based on the actual options attached to this question.)
