All categories

3 years ago

Florida has an agreement with some other states which recognizes the similarity in education and experience requirements

Business

1 answer:

babymother [125]3 years ago

6 0

Correct/Complete Question:

Florida has an agreement with some other states which recognizes the similarity in education and experience requirements for licensees. What is the agreement called?

(a) Reciprocity

(b) Mutual recognition

(d) Intrastate licensing

Answer:

B, Mutual recognition

Explanation:

Mutual recognition agreement is an agreement that exists between two or more governments that has all parties agree to recognize each other's assessment results.

As regards the state of Florida in the question, it has mutual recognition agreements with other state(s) in the the area of education and licensing.This means that Florida state has a the process if licensing a real estate agent.

Cheers.

You might be interested in

Identify the percent increase in total sales and the percent increase in sales of trench coats. Then find which percent of incre

geniusboy [140]

The percentage increase in the total sales for 2006 is 15% while the increase in sales of the trench coats is 23.3%; therefore the percentage increase in total sales of trench coats is 8.3% faster.

Computation:

1. The total amount of sales for 2006 and 2007:

$\begin{aligned}\text{Sales of 2006}&=103+297+210+213+137\\&=960\end{aligned}$

$\begin{aligned}\text{Sales of 2007}&=127+223+210+285+259\\&=1104\end{aligned}$

2. Now, the percentage increase will be determined for the total number of coats and trench coats:

For the total number of coats, the values used will be the total sales of 2006, and total sales of 2007.

$\begin{aligned}\text{Percentage Increase}&=\dfrac{\text{Sales of 2007}-\text{Sales of 2006}}{\text{Sales of 2006}}\times100\\&=\dfrac{1104-960}{960}\times100\\&=15\%\end{aligned}$

For the trench coats the values used will be the sale of trench coats in 2006 and 2007.

$\begin{aligned}\text{Percentage Increase in Sale of Trench Coat}&=\dfrac{\text{Sales of 2007}-\text{Sales of 2006}}{\text{Sales of 2006}}\times100\\&=\dfrac{127-103}{103}\times100\\&=23.33\%\end{aligned}$

3. Now, the net percentage increase in sales due to the trench coats is computed as follows:

$\begin{aligned}\text{Net Percentage Change}&=\text{\text{Percentage Increase in Trench Coat}-\text{Percentage Increase}}\\&=23.33\%-15\%\\&=8.3\%\end{aligned}$

Therefore, the correct option is option B. Sales of trench coats increased 8. 3 percentage points faster than total coat sales.

To know more about percentages of increase in sales, refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/45525

4 0

2 years ago

Henry Garrison starts the month with a balance on his credit card of $1,130. The average daily balance for the month, including

hoa [83]

Answer:

Interest expense $ 11.15

Explanation:

As the bank uses the average daily balance excluding new purchases we should use that amount to solve for the interest expense.

The rate is one and a half percent therefore, 1.5% --> 0.015

principal x rate = interest

$743 x 0.015 = $ 11.145

3 0

3 years ago

What is the maximum amount a firm should pay for a project that will return $15,000 annually for 5 years if the opportunity cost

vampirchik [111]

Answer:

The firm should pay $46907.57 for the given project.

Explanation:

Given information:

Return = $15000 annually

Time = 5 years

Opportunity cost = 18%

The formula for payment is

$PV=R(\frac{1}{OC}-\frac{1}{OC(1+OC)^t})$

where, R is return, OC is opportunity cost, t is time in years.

Substitute R=15000, t=5 and OC=0.18 in the above formula.

$PV=15000(\frac{1}{0.18}-\frac{1}{0.18(1+0.18)^5})$

$PV=46907.5653141$

$PV\approx 46907.57$

Therefore the firm should pay $46907.57 for the given project.

8 0

2 years ago

Dora earns 50,000 a year at her johs. when she was given a raise of 5,000 her spending increased from 50,000 to 54,000 calvulate

weqwewe [10]

Given:
ΔY = $5,000, the change in income
ΔS = 50,000 - 54,000 = - 4,000, the change in savings.

By definition,
MPS (Marginal Propensity to Spend) is
MPS = ΔS/ΔY = -4000/5000 = -0.8

The relation between MPS and MPC (Marginal Propensity to Consume) is
MPS + MPC = 1.
Therefore
MPC - 0.8 = 1
MPC = 1.8

Answer:
MPS = 0.8
MPC = 1.8

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose that Under Armor and Nike are the sole producers of a particularly comfortable athletic shoe. The two firms currently ch

gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

b. both firms will reduce their price.

Explanation:

The Nash equilibrium is a decision-making theorem that lies inside the game theory where the player could attain the expected result by not deviating to the beginning strategy. In this, the strategy of the each player is optimal at the time when the other player decisions are relevant

So as per the given situation, both the firm should decrease their price

hence the option b is correct

7 0

2 years ago