Answer:
No.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here i put it in a graph for you to see.
Graph y=x^2+y^2-4x+8y+16
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a really famous diagram! The circle has been divided into many wedges (think slices of pizza!). The wedges have been colored alternately blue and yellow, then the wedges were rearranged to form a "rectangle" -- well, it's approximately a rectangle because the wedges have arcs (pieces of a circle) on them. See how the bottom and top edges of the rectangle look bumpy?
The area of the "rectangle" is approximately . The reason is that the height of the rectangle is <em>r</em> , the radius of the circle. And the length of the rectangle is about
-- half the circumference of the circle. It's half because the circumference is in the bumpy parts of the wedges--half blue, half yellow.
The approximation improves as the number of wedges increases. In fact, as the number of slices (sorry, pizza again) gets larger, the length of the rectangle gets closer and closer to half the circumference. In other words, making more wedges makes the rectangle less bumpy!
Answer:
The answer is:
She used the wrong common denominator
Step-by-step explanation:
Solving the given equation
Lets consider the steps given in the question:
Lets compare both solutions:
In the original solution, the denominator of first term is (x-2)(x-3)
In the solution given in the question, the denominator of first term is (x-2)(x+3).
So the mistake she did in step 2 was that she change the sign of 3 in (x-3) from negative to positive, due to which she gets the wrong common denominator shown in Step 3.