Answer:
Explanation:
George Washington was a Great General,a Great Leader and a great first president.He proved loyal in all of his ways and always he did what was needed.Although he had fake teeth.
George Washington was a great General.When he went into war,he always went in and never stopped until his side if the team won.Although he might have had a few losses of war.George Washington would clearly be a very good general because of his leadership position.But not just because of his position,but because of how he acted.
George Washington became a great leader in many ways.George Washington was the kind that didn't care too much about what he was or what he looked like.He proved a good leader for his people because he didn't care about himself .He cared for other people,their freedom and such as.
George Washington was a great first president too!He was a role model for other presidents too!George was the one who thought of the name "president".So it occurs that he might have had a lot of great ideas or he might have not .Either way it doesn't really matter,George Washington was a great first role model.
And about those dental teeth................................................................
George Washington lost his teeth when he was young due to either bad diet or a disease.It wasn't very easy to keep your teeth at such a old time.About the time when he almost died,he had only one tooth left in his mouth!!So pretty obviously he wore dentures.Hard Dentures.
General President Leader Washington was a good leader no matter his name.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the best answer would be D.
Feel free to correct me if i'm wrong cause i'm not 100% sure..
He feels calm, peacful, and ect.
Answer:
a. Critical legal studies school of thought
Explanation:
As we can see in the text above, the narrator challenges and criticizes the dogmatic and inflexible rules applied to different situations. This is an inherent characteristic of the Critical legal studies school of thought, which was formed by a group of intellectuals who believed that the law has no neutralities and that it is formed from policies that must be questioned and challenged. These schools of thought preached revolt against the norms and standards described as correct in legal theories and practices.
