This is a case in which apparently students can appeal to the fulfillment of the First Amendment that states the Freedom of Speech but I think that we have to remember that in any case our rights finish when we interfere with other peoples's rights.
I believe that schools, teachers and parents must get an agreement about what is good and bad for students because they are not mature enough to decide by themselves.
In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier the supreme court rules in favor of the school board and make the difference between a private forum and a public forum stating that a school is a private forum.
Imagine that students were allowed to do whatever they want and present whatever play they wish then the school would have no rules and when a place has no rules it becomes jungle law
Answer: Charismatic leaders are self confident and charming
.
Transformational leaders use ideas to gain support
.
Explanation:
Charismatic leaders are interesting people to whom people are naturally drawn. They use this skill to lead people, knowing that they give off a sense of self confidence that inspires the confidence of others. In contrast, transformational leaders find a shared value or idea and use that to gain the support of their followers.
The two styles are similar in the sense that they both gain the support of followers, and are effective methods of leadership.
The difference between the two styles is the driving force, while charismatic leadership is built around the leader, transformational leadership is around an idea, and it usually involves the input of the other members of the team, not just the leader.
Facial feedback effect happens when the facial muscles triggerasd corresponding feelings such as fear or happiness. In addition, The facial feedback hypothesis explains that our movements could be affected by our emotions. The pioneer of this hypothesis was the psychologist Renee Grinnell.
