This statement is true. Members of racial and ethnic minorities are frequently given lower-quality care and are less likely to obtain preventative health services than white people. Additionally, they experience worse health outcomes for a few illnesses.
How are minorities affected by healthcare?
Minority Americans Experience Lower Insurance Coverage Rates and Limited Access to Healthcare all Americans who lack health insurance have reduced access to care and more unpleasant medical experiences. African Americans and Hispanics are particularly in danger of going without insurance.
How does socioeconomic status affect health care?
Access to healthcare is significantly impacted by low SES. Low-income individuals are more likely to be Medicaid beneficiaries or uninsured, have worse quality healthcare, seek medical attention less frequently, and are more likely to do so in an emergency.
Learn more about socioeconomic status affect health care: brainly.com/question/12482069
#SPJ4
Answer:
The entry to record bad debt expense:
Debit Bad debts expense $24,446
Credit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $24,446
Explanation:
1. At December 31, 2020,
Bad debt are estimated: 11% x $204,600 = $22,506
Before adjusting, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts had a debit balance of $1,940. So Bad debt expense will be: $1,940 + $22,506 = $24,446
The adjustment to record Bad debt expense and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
Debit Bad debts expense $24,446
Credit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $24,446
Answer:
The people who buy the stock
Explanation:
I'm not sure but that's my best guess considering they bought it and would more than likely have to sign a contract of liability.
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
If a company sells a product at a price that is less than the cost of producing the product, then it is engaged in dumping.
<h3>What do you mean by a Product?</h3>
A product refers to any product, goods, or services intended for sale purposes. Goods, services, experiences, shopping, convenience, specialty goods, consumer goods, and industrial goods are the different types of products.
Dumping refers to when a company or country exports a product that is lower in the foreign market than the domestic export market. According to World Trade Organization, dumping is legal.
Therefore, Dumping is when a company sells a product that is lower than the cost of producing the product.
Learn more about the product here: brainly.com/question/22852400
#SPJ1
