To fill the squares look for the one filled in column/row/diagonal and figure out its sum.
All other columns/rows/diagonals must be equal to that, so whenever there is a column/row/diagonal with a single missing value you can add the others up and calculate the missing value.
So you have to find those single missing value columns/rows/diagonals, fill them out and continue with the next one until the whole square is filled in.
Answer: r = 7
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract 12 from both sides to isolate the r variable. You have -42 = -6r. Divide both sides by -6 to get r by itself and you get r = 7. Verify by substituting 7 as the r value and solving the equation.
Answer:
D. D is the correct answer
We are given with three lengths of a triangle expressed in terms and variables: (3x – 4) feet, (x^2 – 1) feet, and (2x^2 – 15) feet. The perimeter of the triangle is equal to the sum of the three sides of the triangle. In this case, the sum is 3x^2 + 3x -20. When x is equal to 4, we substitute <span>3*16 + 3*4 -20 equal to 40 feet.</span>
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
