Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
Answer:
Option 2
Explanation:
don't don't hold me to this but I think it's decreased trade among countries has caused whittling world economy because that is a problem and problems are typically a push factor
Answer and Explanation:
A resource that can be used to evaluate your statement about the effectiveness of toothpaste is the comparison between the effect it has on teeth, with the effect of an ordinary toothpaste. You could do this by bringing your family members together and separating them into two groups. One group would use regular toothpaste and the other group would use toothpaste which you believe actually whitens your teeth. The groups were to use the same toothpaste for a month and were to take pictures of the teeth each week. These photos would help you compare the whitening effect of toothpaste and thus prove that your toothpaste is efficient in whitening teeth, as it promises.
Creatures is what it’s referring to
