Answer:
This concept is based on the psychological theory of cognitive dissonance.
Explanation:
People try to remain in a state of cognitive consistency so that they can function mentally in the real world. Cognitive consistency happens when our beliefs and behaviors are in harmony. Cognitive dissonance, on the other hand, happens when we are introduced to knowledge that imbalances that harmony, that is, when we feel that our beliefs and attitudes are in conflict due to the new information we've received. When that takes place, we are driven to reduce the mental discomfort and restore balance. That can make us more likely to change our minds - having our beliefs questioned.
Answer:
Shape social policy
Explanation:
The citizenry have such needs as instruction, government managed savings, wellbeing administrations, and lodging. Social arrangement plans to guarantee the government assistance of people through authoritative guidelines. Since social approach is influenced by social advancements, it changes dependent on the necessities of people.
In this case, th terrorism plays a role which is against society. Then, the social policy is needed to prevent them get hurt in any form.
Answer:
Patrilineal.
Explanation:
It is also known as the male line and it is a common descent system in which the individual´s family line derives from the father´s lineage. It generally involves the heritage of property rights, names, titles. Their ancestors are traced only by the male line.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
