Go to the bathroom, get a glass of water and review you topics.
Solution :
The risk averse is the person who wishes to reduce the uncertainty attached to the money.
Certain income = $2000.
50-50 chance of 1000 and 3000 would income expected income of
(0.5 x 1000) +(0.5 x 3000) = 2000
Both of them gives an equal amount of income while there is uncertainty attached with the second case which makes the risk averse person disincline to follow.
Hence the statement is FALSE.
Assume that the population level in a country is X. 5 percent of the population are likely to get affected by the disease due to which it makes a population of 0.05 X population to be effected by the disease. The population level will cost $38,000, hence making the total healthcare cost to be 1900 X.
Answer: $770.22
Explanation:
If she makes equal contributions then those would be annuities. The $9,000 she wants to have will be the future value of the amount currently in her account and the annuity.
9,000 = 5,000 ( 1 + r) ^ n + ( annuity * future value interest factor of an annuity, 9%, 3 years)
9,000 = 5,000 ( 1 + 9%) ^ 3 + ( Annuity * 3.2781)
9,000 = 6,475.145 + 3.2781 * Annuity
Annuity = (9,000 - 6,475.145) / 3.2781
Annuity = $770.22
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
$220 million
Explanation:
According to given information in question:
Assets = $400 million
Liabilities = $180 million
Accounting Equation:
Assets = Equity + Liabilities
$400 million = Equity + $180 million
Equity = $400 million - $180 million
Equity = $220 million
Based on the accounting equation, Prosian Italia's owners' equity is equal to $220 million.
