We square the residuals when using the least-squares line method to find the line of best fit because we believe that huge negative residuals (i.e., points well below the line) are just as harmful as large positive residuals (i.e., points that are high above the line).
<h3>What do you mean by Residuals?</h3>
We treat both positive and negative disparities equally by squaring the residual values. We cannot discover a single straight line that concurrently minimizes all residuals. The average (squared) residual value is instead minimized.
We might also take the absolute values of the residuals rather than squaring them. Positive disparities are viewed as just as harmful as negative ones under both strategies.
To know more about the Least-Squares Line method, visit:
brainly.com/question/14940432
#SPJ4
Answer:
-f(3x - 1) + 2 = -18x² + 12x + 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Find f(3x - 1)
f(3x - 1) = 2(3x - 1)² - 1
f(3x - 1) = 2(9x² - 6x + 1) - 1
f(3x - 1) = 18x² - 12x + 2 - 1
f(3x - 1) = 18x² - 12x + 1
Step 2: Plug in f(3x - 1)
-(18x² - 12x + 1) + 2
Step 3: Evaluate
-18x² + 12x - 1 + 2
-f(3x - 1) + 2 = -18x² + 12x + 1
Hope this answer helps you! If it did, please mark it as the brainiest! I would really appreciate it! :)
Answer : The different is, find BC - AC and find AC + CB, find AB and find CA + BC are same.
Step-by-step explanation :
As see that, AB is a line segment in which point C is represented in between the line.
As we are given that:
AC = 3
CB = 7
So,
AC + CB = 3 + 7 = 10
Similarly,
CA + BC = 3 + 7 = 10
Similarly,
AB = AC + CB = 3 + 7 = 10
But,
BC - AC = 7 - 3 = 4
From this we conclude that, find AC + CB, find AB and find CA + BC are same things while find BC - AC is a different thing.
Hence, the different is, find BC - AC and find AC + CB, find AB and find CA + BC are same.
To solve this, let's use the variable 'x' to represent the money invested:
11(0.026(x)) = 6500
0.286x = 6500
Divide:
x = 227272.7272...
We can round up:
x = 227272.73
June has to invest $227272.73
