Answer:
The employer wins because he is acting on court orders.
Explanation:
Discrimination in the workplace is a punishable offense by the law. This act of promoting one female for every male promoted is a remedy to being found guilty of discrimination by the court.
In this case where he has been sued again for reverse discrimination, he (employer) is going to win this particular one because he was only acting on court order. The one female for every male was imposed on him by the court. So he is protected from this reverse discrimination accusations by his disgruntled employees.
The department store carrying whoo is named SASA
Answer:
It drives down prices for consumers.
Explanation:
Based on the merits and demerits of stocks and interest incomes, it is false to say that one is better than the other.
<h3>Which is better between interest income and stocks?</h3><h3 />
Interest income is more appealing to certain people such as those who don't want to incur a lot of risk because interest-based investments such as bonds are generally safer.
Stocks are appealing to people who don't mind higher levels of risk as stock returns are generally riskier.
These two things are therefore subjectively better depending on the risk tolerance of the investor.
Complete question:
Trading in company stocks> interest income only
True or False.
Find out more on risk tolerance at brainly.com/question/26507665.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Journal entries
Explanation:
The journal entries are as follows
1. Cash $748,800
Interest expense $31,200 ($780,000 × 4%)
To Note payable $780,000
(Being the cash received is recorded)
2. Cash Dr $507,000
To Account receivables $507,000
(Being the collection is recorded)
3. Note payable $507,000
Interest expense $2,600 ($780,000 × 4% × 1 month ÷ 12 month)
To Cash $509,600
(Being the note payable and the interest expense is recorded)