The hypothesis shows that we have evidence that the proportion surviving after eating organic is higher.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
The following can be deduced from the information:
x1 = 275
x2 = 170
n1 = 500
n2 = 500
The sample proportion will be:
p1 = 275/500 = 0.55
p2 = 170/500 = 0.34
The pooled proportion will be:
= (275 + 170)/(500 + 500)
= 0.44
The test statistic is 6.681. It should be noted that the test statistics is a number that's calculated by a statistical test. It shows how the observed data are far from the null hypothesis.
The p value in this scenario is extremely small. The p value is a measurement used to validate a hypothesis against the observed data. Therefore, we have to reject the null hypothesis.
In this case, the hypothesis shows that we have evidence that the proportion surviving after eating organic is higher.
Learn more about hypothesis on:
brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ1
A) After any given year the amount of money would be: [(1000*.04)x]+1000
and x stands for the number of years.
B) The interest is 4%.
C) There would be $3,480.00 after 4 years.
You can convert the fraction to a decimal form.
7/9 is .778
.778 is greater than .6
Answer: a because it’s using the commutative property of addition meaning it’s the same mathematical statement, it’s just moved around
Step-by-step explanation:
