I wholeheartedly agree and think it’s practically self-evident.
Here’s an excellent example from history.
For 28 years, the Berlin Wall separated East Berlin from West Berlin and was the most heavily militarized border crossing in the Western hemisphere. In 1989, during a press conference with western media, Gunther Schabowski was handed a note explaining a change in policy governing border crossing. Several discussions took place about making a show of opening the border between East and West Germany, but nobody informed Schabowski.
At the end of the press conference, he appears to have remembered the note belatedly, and read it verbatim—which was not what was intended. When asked about when the border would open, he assumed it was immediate.
The reality of course was that East Germany had no intention of opening the border, and certainly not immediately.
Within hours, the border crossing was practically buried under thousands of East Germans eager to be reunited with their families and other loved ones after 28 years on the press conference, which had been broadcast live.
The East Germans believed what they were told: Schabowski said immediately, and they intended to go immediately.
Border guards kept calling for instructions, until finally, they relented.
Perception became reality, and the border between East and West Berlin opened, spelling the de facto end of the separation of Germany.
273 viewsView 2 Upvoters · Answer requested by Never Wong
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
Answer:
A Public Company is owned and traded publicly on the stock exchange. A Private Company is owned and traded privately. Limited can use after the public company name (Example- ABC Limited). Private Limited can be used after the private company name.
Answer: condition subsequent
Explanation: A condition subsequent is an incident or set of circumstances that bring something to a conclusion. A subsequent circumstance is being used as a symbol in a legal sense to put an end of one's constitutional rights or responsibilities.
This generally occurs when someone do anything illegal or unethical in the eyes of law. In the given case, Franco got employed by some other party although he had a contract with James that he cannot do that. Hence we can conclude that the given case depicts condition subsequent.