Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In the model
Log (salary) = B0 + B1LSAT +B2GPA +B3log(libvol) +B4log(cost)+B5 rank+u
The hypothesis that rank has no effect on log (salary) is H0:B5 = 0. The estimated equation (now with standard errors) is
Log (salary) = 8.34 + .0047 LSAT + .248 GPA + .095 log(libvol)
(0.53) (.0040) (.090) (.033)
+ .038 log(cost) – .0033 rank
(.032) (.0003)
n = 136, R2 = .842.
The t statistic on rank is –11(i.e. 0.0033/0.0003), which is very significant. If rank decreases by 10 (which is a move up for a law school), median starting salary is predicted to increase by about 3.3%.
(ii) LSAT is not statistically significant (t statistic ≈1.18) but GPA is very significance (t statistic ≈2.76). The test for joint significance is moot given that GPA is so significant, but for completeness the F statistic is about 9.95 (with 2 and 130 df) and p-value ≈.0001.
f + 6 = ?
Well, the answer can be pretty much any number. It all depends on what number f is. f is a variable, so you can plug in any number to replace f.
For example, if f was 5, this is what the equation would look like:
5 + 6 = 11
If f was -3, this is what the equation would look like:
-3 + 6 = 3
So, again, the answer can be anything. It depends on what f is.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>We can't multiply.</u>
<u>We got to count up by 12's for each 1/2 hour.</u>
12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168.
<u>Simplified:</u>
- 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168.
<u>Estimate:</u>
- 12 = 1/2 hour
- 24 = 1 hour
- 36 = 1 1/2 hours
- 48 = 2 hours
- 60 = 2 1/2 hours
- 72 = 3 hours
- 84 = 3 1/2 hours
- 96 = 4 hours
- 108 = 4 1/2 hours
- 120 = 5 hours.
- 132 = 5 1/2 hours
- 144 = 6 hours
- 156 = 6 1/2 hours
- 168 = 7 hours.
Answer is 168.
Answer:
He sold 21 CDs
Step-by-step explanation:
200w + 2c = s
W= weeks C= cd sold S = total salary
