Answer:
Which period? But if it's about the 1960's here : What was happening in Europe in the 1960s?
In the Sixties, the Soviet Bloc began to show signs of disintegration. Yugoslavia, Albania, and Czechoslovakia all rebelled against Russian rule.
Explanation:
hope it helped?
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
The 1AD was the first armored division of the United States' Army to see battle in World War II.
<h3>What is the 1st armored division?</h3>
In 2003, the division became the largest division-based task force in US. Army History.
The armored division was involves in the Korean War, Cuban Missile Crisis, Persian Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan war etc.
In conclusion, the 1AD was the first armored division of the United States' Army to see battle in World War II.
Read more about 1st armored division
<em>brainly.com/question/7069876</em>
#SPJ11
<u>Mixed Economy:</u>
The mixed economy in economics cohabits with the government's intervention in the market systems of allocating resources, trade, and commerce.
When a government gets involved to undermine free markets through the establishment of state-owned companies (such as public healthcare or education), legislation, incentives, tariffs, and taxation policies, it may create a mixed economy.
It is structured among true capitalism and true socialism, with a certain number of free-market components and social democratic elements. It is the combination of the aspects of capitalism and socialism.
Mixed economies generally preserve private control and ownership over most production processes but often regulated by the state. These type of economies are socializing industries which are considered essential.
Even if some economists question the economic consequences of different mixed modes of economics, they are all common in historical and contemporary economies.
Answer:
Wallace's main argument is that he cannot but feel that these actions (bomb-testing) must make it look to the rest of the world as if the U.S. was only paying lip service to peace at the conference table.