Answer : The specific heat of the metal is, 
Explanation :
In this problem we assumed that heat given by the hot body is equal to the heat taken by the cold body.
where,
= specific heat of metal = ?
= specific heat of ice = 
= mass of metal = 1.00 kg
= mass of ice = 1.00 kg
= final temperature of mixture = 
= initial temperature of metal = 
= initial temperature of ice = 
Now put all the given values in the above formula, we get:
![(1.00kg)\times c_1\times (-8.88-5.00)^oC=-[(1.00kg)\times 2000J/kg^oC\times (-8.88-(-24.0))^oC]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%281.00kg%29%5Ctimes%20c_1%5Ctimes%20%28-8.88-5.00%29%5EoC%3D-%5B%281.00kg%29%5Ctimes%202000J%2Fkg%5EoC%5Ctimes%20%28-8.88-%28-24.0%29%29%5EoC%5D)
Therefore, the specific heat of the metal is,
Answer:
Correlation does not mean <em>causation</em> even after having a relatively high correlation coefficient as a result.
Step-by-step explanation:
Correlation and causation are not the same. Correlation does not mean that variations in one variable <em>cause</em> variations in the second variable. Instead, correlation considers that variations in one variable <em>corresponds</em> with variations of the second variable. No more.
Correlation is an important first step to establish that one variable possibly can cause some effect on the other, but it is not a definitive answer to this question. It is crucial to find other possible factors that can explain what causes some effect.
As a conclusion, a positive and relative high correlation coefficient does not necessarily mean causation. It simply tells us that some study found that people that listen to loud music are also people with poor hearing problems, and possibly a cause to the latter variable is to listen loud music repeatedly, but it is a must to find other possible factors before definitely concluding that.
Answer:znmdzfhnnnnnncv
Step-by-step explanation: bvcxjcdjhdfnjdg
418,200 - 326,700 = 91,500
