Answer: single; quantitative
Explanation:
The discounted cash flow analysis is a method that is used to determine the value of a project, security, or assets by using time value of money.
The discounted cash flow analysis is used in real estate, investment finance, patent valuation etc. A modified DCF analysis is best for evaluating and selecting the optimal strategic alternative when a company has single goal(s) and quantitative measures.
Sally works for Timber Products, Inc. The basis for her contribution under the Federal Insurance Contribution Act to help pay for benefits that will partially make up for her loss of income on retirement is her annual wage base.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The contribution that Sally, who is working for Timber Products incorporation, has to make for federal insurance contribution act is based on the amount of wage that Sally gets on an annual basis or the wage that she gets in a year.
A part of that wage which is a particular percentage is paid to the federal insurance contribution act who is going to benefit her in case she incurs any kind of loss of income.
The answer is: averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
When we use principle of aggregation, we would not rely on single measurement to make a representation of a person's behavior. We rely more on multiple sets of measurements.
From the case above, Sheridan not attending the services for two weeks could be explained by things such as personal issues or physical illness. Since she considers herself as religious who attend regularly, it is very likely that averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
