All categories

3 years ago

If I travel 400 kilometers in 10 hours what is my speed

Physics

2 answers:

xxTIMURxx [149]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

40km/hr

Explanation:

we divide the distance with time

Illusion [34]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

<h3>The answer is 40 km/ hr</h3>

Explanation:

To find the speed we use the formula

$speed \: = \frac{distance}{time}$

From the question

The distance is 400 km

The time is 10 hours

Substitute the values into the above formula

That's

$Speed = \frac{400 \: km}{10 \: hours}$

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

You might be interested in

What is the safest way to enter a body of water? Enter with you feet first. Dive in.

zimovet [89]

Answer: feet first

Explanation:

It is always the safest to enter with your feet first. You can become paralyzed or injure you neck if you dive into a body of water that is too shallow. Therefore its always best to dive feet first instead.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

một quả bóng quần vợt nặng 0,060kg chuyển động với tốc độ 45,0m/s va vào bức tường dưới một góc 45 độ rồi bật trở ra với ucngf t

Vinvika [58]

can you tell in English.......

5 0

3 years ago

What is the energy difference between the second excited state and first excited state of an electron in the "box" of size L=1nm

jolli1 [7]

I thinks it’s A, tell me if you get it right

4 0

3 years ago

The boundary between the crust and mantle is marked by a seismic-velocity discontinuity called

Minchanka [31]

The boundary between the crust and mantle is marked by a seismic-velocity discontinuity is called Mohorovicic discontinuity.

Mohorovicic discontinuity was discovered by Andrija Mohorovicic in 1909 who was a Croatian seismologist. He realized that the velocity of a seismic wave is related to the material's density where it is moving through. He decoded that the acceleration of the seismic waves that are observed within outer shell of the earth is a compositional change. Thus, the acceleration should be caused by a material of higher density.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Consider an object with s=12cm that produces an image with s′=15cm. Note that whenever you are working with a physical object, t

Leni [432]

A. 6.67 cm

The focal length of the lens can be found by using the lens equation:

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{s}+\frac{1}{s'}$

where we have

f = focal length

s = 12 cm is the distance of the object from the lens

s' = 15 cm is the distance of the image from the lens

Solving the equation for f, we find

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{12 cm}+\frac{1}{15 cm}=0.15 cm^{-1}\\f=\frac{1}{0.15 cm^{-1}}=6.67 cm$

B. Converging

According to sign convention for lenses, we have:

- Converging (convex) lenses have focal length with positive sign

- Diverging (concave) lenses have focal length with negative sign

In this case, the focal length of the lens is positive, so the lens is a converging lens.

C. -1.25

The magnification of the lens is given by

$M=-\frac{s'}{s}$

where

s' = 15 cm is the distance of the image from the lens

s = 12 cm is the distance of the object from the lens

Substituting into the equation, we find

$M=-\frac{15 cm}{12 cm}=-1.25$

D. Real and inverted

The magnification equation can be also rewritten as

$M=\frac{y'}{y}$

where

y' is the size of the image

y is the size of the object

Re-arranging it, we have

$y'=My$

Since in this case M is negative, it means that y' has opposite sign compared to y: this means that the image is inverted.

Also, the sign of s' tells us if the image is real of virtual. In fact:

- s' is positive: image is real

- s' is negative: image is virtual

In this case, s' is positive, so the image is real.

E. Virtual

In this case, the magnification is 5/9, so we have

$M=\frac{5}{9}=-\frac{s'}{s}$

which can be rewritten as

$s'=-M s = -\frac{5}{9}s$

which means that s' has opposite sign than s: therefore, the image is virtual.

F. 12.0 cm

From the magnification equation, we can write

$s'=-Ms$

and then we can substitute it into the lens equation:

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{s}+\frac{1}{s'}\\\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{s}+\frac{1}{-Ms}$

and we can solve for s:

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{M-1}{Ms}\\f=\frac{Ms}{M-1}\\s=\frac{f(M-1)}{M}=\frac{(-15 cm)(\frac{5}{9}-1}{\frac{5}{9}}=12.0 cm$

G. -6.67 cm

Now the image distance can be directly found by using again the magnification equation:

$s'=-Ms=-\frac{5}{9}(12.0 cm)=-6.67 cm$

And the sign of s' (negative) also tells us that the image is virtual.

H. -24.0 cm

In this case, the image is twice as tall as the object, so the magnification is

M = 2

and the distance of the image from the lens is

s' = -24 cm

The problem is asking us for the image distance: however, this is already given by the problem,

s' = -24 cm

so, this is the answer. And the fact that its sign is negative tells us that the image is virtual.

3 0

3 years ago