1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesna [10]
3 years ago
8

If the government removes a $4 tax on buyers of restaurant meals and imposes the same 4 tax on sellers of restaurant meals, then

the price paid by buyers will
A. decrease, and the price received by sellers will decrease.
B. decrease, and the price received by sellers will not change.
C. not change, and the price received by sellers will not change.
D. not change, and the price received by sellers will decrease.
Business
1 answer:
Tanya [424]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C. not change, and the price received by sellers will not change.

Explanation:

Because previously there was a tax of the same ammoutn nothing will change. The sellers will will transfer the tax into the price therefore, the after-tax proceeds will not change netiher the selling price. The same effect of the consumer tax will occur again, some or the entire tax will be pay for the seller or the consumer based on the elasticity of the supply and demand curve.

The effect of chaging the law will not alter the economic reality of translate taxes into consumers

You might be interested in
When treasury stock is purchased for an amount greater than its par, what is the effect on total shareholders' equity?
fomenos

When treasury stock is purchased for an amount greater than its par then the total shareholders' equity decreases.

Given that the treasury stock is purchased for an amount greater than its par.

We are required to find the effect of the purchase of treasury stock for an amount greater than its par on the total shareholders' equity.

Treasury stock is basically known as treasury shares or reacquired stock, and refers to previously outstanding stock that is bought back from stockholders by the issuing company. The result of issuing treasury stock is that the total number of outstanding shares on the open market decreases. Shares of a company are a part of total shareholders' equity and because shares are issued for security, it will decrease the total shareholders;equity.

Hence when treasury stock is purchased for an amount greater than its par then the total shareholders' equity decreases.

Learn more about treasury stock at brainly.com/question/17439058

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
A farmer realizes that he is not getting fair price from the agents who buy produce from him and sell it to the markets. As such
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

The answer is: A) Forward vertical integration (FVI)

Explanation:

FVI takes place when a company expands its business activities to take direct control of the distribution of their products.

The question is a textbook example of FVI. A company decides to sell their products directly to their customers bypassing the middlemen.

Internet sales are giving several companies this opportunity. For instance, every once in a while I get promotions directly from the Coca Cola Company offering me direct discounts on their products. Of course some type of courier or logistics company is needed, but the sale is made directly from the distributor bypassing the grocery store. A more common example is people buying their cars directly in the manufacturers website. In Germany, car vending machines are located right next to the factories. You buy online and you pick your car like a soda can, only on a huge scale.

8 0
3 years ago
9 . Implied interest rate and period Consider the case of the following annuities, and the need to compute either their expected
vodomira [7]

Answer:

IRR 6% for Jabob

His friend will need 12 years saving cash to obtain their collegue funds.

Explanation:

We will solve for the rate being the annuity of 3 payment of 800

and the present value 2,138.41

C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\  

C 800

time 3

PV 2,138.41

rate ?

800 \times \frac{1-(1+x)^{-3} }{x} = 2,138.41\\  

To solve we can use excel, a financial calculator or trial and error

For excel we will do the following:

write the list of cash through the loan life:

-2,138.41

+800

+800

+800

then we write in the empy cell

=IRR(

select the values and press enter

This will give the IRR which is 6%

For the second assignment:

we need to solve for time:

C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\  

C    3,800

time            n  

rate            0.06

PV $31,897

3800 \times \frac{1-(1+0.06)^{-n} }{0.06} = 31,897\\  

 We work out the formula:

(1+0.06)^{-n} = \frac{31,897\times 0.06}{3,800}

Now we solve the right side and apply logarithmic properties

-n = \frac{log0.503636842
}{log1.06}

-n = -11.77128325

n = 11.77

It will take 12 years to obtain their target amount

3 0
3 years ago
Brenda says her assets are definitely greater than her liabilities. which explains whether brenda is correct? brenda is correct
yuradex [85]

Brenda is not correct because the total value of her assets could be less than the liabilities.

<h3>What are liabilities?</h3>

A liability is an obligation that a person or business has, typically financial in nature. Over time, liabilities are resolved by the transmission of economic advantages like cash, products, or services.

Liabilities on the balance sheet's right side are represented by debts like as loans, accounts payable, mortgages, deferred revenue, bonds, warranties, and accumulated costs.

Assets can be contrasted with liabilities. Assets are items you own or owe money to, whereas liabilities are debts or other obligations.

An obligation between two parties that has not yet been fulfilled or paid for is generally referred to as a liability.

Learn more about liabilities

brainly.com/question/14921529

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Gladys learns from her agent Phil that he has just received a full price offer from a minority couple. She tells Phil to pull he
GaryK [48]

Answer:

both Gladys and Phil

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario both Gladys and Phil are guilty of violating the Fair Housing Law.  The Fair Housing law completely outlaws the refusal to sell a house or property to someone on the basis of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin. Which is exactly why Gladys and Phil removed the property and did not want to sell to the minority couple.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Milton Friedman argues that businesses:
    8·1 answer
  • Assume you are holding a business meeting with five people, each from a different continent (North America, South America, Europ
    9·1 answer
  • Deng Xiaoping would most likely agree that. . free enterprise can boost a nation's economy. . free enterprise has no place in a
    8·1 answer
  • _______ authority emphasizes that Federal disaster assistance is intended to supplement, not supplant, the resources of State, l
    9·1 answer
  • Laila created a new piece of workout gear. She's calling it the Toned Tushie. Although she couldn't initially find potential inv
    10·1 answer
  • Select the items that describe incentives.can be rewards or penaltiesinfluence future actionsencourage people to actcan be monet
    12·2 answers
  • Blooming Sun investment corporation is facing problems in their records
    5·1 answer
  • You place a stop-loss order to sell 500 shares of AAPL with a stop price of $180. The current price is $185. How much will you r
    7·1 answer
  • In 2019, Henry Jones (Social Security number 123-45-6789) works as a freelance driver, finding customers using various platforms
    15·1 answer
  • Where do teenagers get all the money they need to make purchases? I noticed several new stores had opened up at the local mall.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!