<span>There are several principles of democracy. In a democratic society, everyone is
equal. This means that they have the
same rights no matter who they are. The
laws and institutions are based on fairness and impartiality. This means no one
gets preferential treatment. Ideas come from individuals and those ideas are shown
to a council who vote on it. People have
the right to express their ideas in a democratic society. Though the majority holds power, the minority
and absentee members’ rights will be respected.
Whether you are from the majority or minority, you have rights and those
rights allow you to take part in important discussions or events. Systems and procedures in a democratic
society is done in openness where everyone has the right to know the whole
truth. Leaders and officials are chosen
by the people through an election process.
When their term of office ends, they return to civilian life. Power in all
branches of government is shared equally.</span>
Answer:
critical medical anthropology
Explanation:
The perspective MOST important to her goal is critical medical anthropology. Critical medical anthropology lays emphasis on how politics and economic powers take part in influencing welfare and sickness, and also how the world Human population experience health and illness. It states the importance of political and Economic compositions on the populace.
It gives an analysis of the effect of inequality and social hierarchy on individual and group health.
Here's a small list of popular books that can help and introduce you to Ancient India. They are all available in English, by the way.
1- "A History of India, vol. 1: From Origins to 1300" (Romila Thapar)
2- "Ancient India as Described in Classical Literature; Being a Collection of Greek and Latin Texts Relating to India, Extracted from Herodotus and Other" (John Watson McCrindle)
3- "The Philosophy of Ancient India" (Richard von Garbe)
4- "Ancient India: in Historical Outline" (D.N. Jha)
5- "The Ancient Geography Of India" (Alexander Cunningham)
I believe the answer is: <span>Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
This case is focused on the standard that the court must used when they're admitting expert testimonies to help with the case because even unqualified 'experts' could really influence juries' opinion. The new standard for experts was later known as the Daubert standard.
</span>