Answer:
Can't
Explanation:
I am not a member of a credit union, therefore I *CANT* use any of its services.
I hope this helps
Answer:
B is the correct option.
Explanation:
This principle follows the assumption that a company will remain in business in the future. It means that the business will not have to halt operations or to liquidate the assets in the future. According to this principle, the accountant postpones the recognition of some expenses till a later period, and in that period the company will be in business will be effectively using the assets. It is a very important concept, without this, the company will not be able to prepay the expenses.
Answer:
$21,000
Explanation:
The new bridge would take 30 man hours of labor at $50 per hour, in activity based costing, this means that ,
30*50 = 1500.
Now, it will require 14 piers to support it each time a pier is sunk into the harbor,hence the final calculation will be:
30*50*14 = 21000.
Hope this Helps.
Goodluck.
Answer:
Stone Foods produces the majority of its cheese products in its U.S. based dairy division at a total outlay cost of $6.00 per unit. A large portion of the finished product is sold to Division B where it is packaged and sold overseas under a different label. The tax rate in Division B's country is higher than the U.S. tax rate. Assume the company desires to minimize the overall tax impact of the transfer (i) what type of relative pre-tax income should each division desire to achieve as a result of the transfer and (ii) what type of transfer price would accomplish your answer to (i).
Dairy Division Income Division B Income Transfer Price
.
Option "D" is the correct answer - High Low High.
Explanation:
Since in Division B, the tax rate is higher than the tax rate in US-based dairy division. Therefore to minimize the impact of the overall tax, transfer price from dairy division should be high to Division B so that the dairy division income would be higher. and the income of Division B would be lower.
Hence option "D" is the correct answer.
Answer: the doctrine of unconscionability
Explanation:
The doctrine of unconscionability is a defense that is against enforcing a contract. From the question, we are informed that Orlin bought a refrigerator, on credit, from a salesman and the salesman want him to pay 10 times the worth of the refrigerator.
In this scenario, the contract is deemed to be unfair and also oppressive to Orlin, thus he a find it unconscionable and therefore he can refuse to enforce it. Therefore, if he wants to challenge the contract’s terms, the doctrine of unconscionability will be used.