Answer:
3-8I am right or wrong and the answer is 5
Answer:
A)-7
B)2
C)-2
D)-4
Step-by-step explanation:
Two consecutive odd integers have a difference of 2. If you let the smaller one of them be x, the other one is x + 2.
Their sum is -36, so add x and x + 2, and set equal to -36. Then solve for x to find the smaller one. Finally, 2 more than x is the greater of the two integers.
x + x + 2 = -36
2x + 2 = -36
2x = -38
x = -19
The smaller one of the two integers is -19.
x + 2 = -19 + 2 = -17
The greater of the two integers is -17.
Answer: The integers are -19 and -17.
Answer:
<h2>
63° or 173°</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
You didn't specify where the point P is so there are two posibilites:
1.
P₁Z is dividing angle OZQ
then:
m∠P₁ZQ = m∠OZQ - m∠OZP₁ = 125° - 62° = 63°
2.
P₂Z is outside angle OZQ
then
m∠P₂ZQ = 360° - (m∠OZQ + m∠OZP₂) = 360° - (125° + 62°) = 173°
Answer:
H0: p = 0.078
Ha: p ≠ 0.078
Step-by-step explanation:
The researchers say that the rate is about 7.8%, or 0.078 as a decimal. That makes that the null hypothesis because using "is" in math is the same as saying "equals" and the null hypothesis always has the statement of equality in it. The reason there is a not equals to sign in the alternate is for this reason as well. The researchers say it is about that amount, not more or less than that amount. So it makes this a 2 tailed test. If the amount is significantly higher or lower, then we might have to reject the null hypothesis depending on the outcome of the test.
