Answer is: 16,56 kJ.
1) m(NH₄Cl) = 5,35g.
m(H₂O) = d(H₂O) · V(H₂O) = 1g/cm³ · 100cm³ = 100g.
ΔT = 25,55°C - 21,79°C = 3,76°C.
Q = m(solution) · C(specific heat capacity of water) ·ΔT.
Q = 105,35g · 4,18 J/g·°C · 3,76°C = 1655,76J.
2) m(NH₄Cl) = 1mol · 53,5g/mol = 53,5g.
m(water) = d(H₂O) · V(H₂O) = 1g/cm³ · 1000cm³ = 1000g.
m(solution) = 1053,5g, ten times more than first solutn.
Q = 10 · 1655,76J = 16557,6J = 16,56 kJ.
Answer:
B. Mixing a solute and a solvent
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, solutions are defined as liquid homogeneous mixtures formed when two substances having affinity are mixed. It is important to notice that the two substances are known as solute, which is added to other substance that is the solvent. Therefore, answer is B. Mixing a solute and a solvent.
Notice that when two insoluble substances are mixed no solution is formed. Furthermore, if two solutes together or a solute and a precipitate are mixed, no liquid homogeneous solution is formed, as commonly solutes are solid, nevertheless, when liquid, one should have to act as the solvent.
Best regards.
We know that
1) empirical formula of a compound is the representation of a molecules with the elements in simplest mole ratio.
2) the molar mass is the actual proportion of moles of elements present in a molecule
3) there is a simple ratio between the molar mass and empirical mass a molecule
Now let us solve each problem
1) empirical formula of 
will be 
2) empirical formula of 
will be
3) empirical formula of 
will be 
4) the molecular formula will be :
the molecular formula = 4 X empirical formula = 4 X CO = 
5) the mole ratio of Cl and Cr is 
empirical formula will be 
(4) Increase citizen participation in government
Primary: a way for citizens to vote for new government officials, not too influenced by party leaders
Secret Ballot: keeping a voter's votes private from others
Recall: a way for citizens to remove a government official from office
Referendum: a way for citizens to vote for or against something proposed by the legislature
During the Progressive Era, many local governments were lead by corrupt political machines. They would rig elections in their favor as well as threaten those who voted against them. Many would appoint their supporters who weren't usually qualified to government positions as incentive to vote for them (I don't know if you care but that's called the spoils system).
<span>It's not (1) because the whole point of primaries, secret ballots, recalls, and referendums was so political machines were not dominating
</span>It's not (2) because none of this has a lot to do with Native Americans
It's not (3) because the political machines were a <u>local</u> government problem, not federal
It <u><em></em>IS</u> (4) because by getting more people involved in the government, they can elect qualified officials, vote on laws that best benefit the people, and minimize corruption.
