Martha states that -6 is a rational number.Wich is a correct explanation for this statement?
2 answers:
<em>Answer: </em>
<u><em>It would be C</em></u>
<em>Step-by-step explanation: </em>
<u><em>The number is between integers, so it can't be an integer or a whole number. It's written as a ratio of two integers, so it's a rational number and not irrational.</em></u>
Answer:
C.
Step-by-step explanation:
because if -6 is a rotational number it should also be able to be translated into a fraction form
You might be interested in
Answer:
11
Step-by-step explanation:
your welcome bro.
Answer:
x=4 and y=4
Step-by-step explanation:
From first function we have:
And from the second one:
Substitute them:
Answer:
y=3/4x+1
Step-by-step explanation:
up 3 right 4. U better hurry up and answer that question my guy!
Answer:
4 11/16 m²
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for the area of a rectangle = Length × Width
From the question:
Length = 1 1/4 m
Width = 3 3/4m
Area of the rectangle =
1 1/4 m × 3 3/4 m
= 5/4 m × 15/4 m
= 75/16 m²
= 4 11/16 m²
Area of the rectangle = 4 11/16 m²
The other person is literally wrong. The answer is D. Supplementary because two angles that add up to 180 are supplementary angles.
